Judging Prophecy: Navigating the Line Between Insight and Illusion Part 2
The purpose of this article is for the people of Most High God to distinguish spirits and discriminate between impurities and authenticity in spirit, especially regarding prophecy, the prophetic, and when prophets prophesy.
Part 2 is about the commonly accepted Scriptural reference 1 Corinthians 14:29, taking a closer look into it. This portion also includes what judging is from a both spiritual and spiritual inheritance standpoint.
By the end of this four-part teaching, you will be equipped to:
- Evaluate truths through uncertainty.
- The power and perils of divine forecasts.
- Decode the truth behind the forecasts.
The phrase “let two or three confirm a matter (1 Cor. 14:29)” has roots in both Hebrew and early Greek cultural practices, particularly in terms of verifying the truth or legitimacy of a claim through multiple witnesses.
It is connected to the principle of establishing testimony, especially in legal matters.
Below is a closer look at its meaning in these cultures and in Paul’s usage in 2 Corinthians 13:1:
Hebrew Culture
In Hebrew culture, especially within Jewish law, the principle that a matter should be confirmed by two or three witnesses is found in the Torah, specifically in Deuteronomy and Numbers. Key passages include:
- Deuteronomy 19:15: “One witness shall not rise against a man concerning any iniquity or any sin that he commits; by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter shall be established.”
- Numbers 35:30: “Whoever kills someone shall be put to death on the testimony of witnesses. But no one shall be put to death on the testimony of a single witness.”
This law stressed the need for multiple witnesses to verify the truth before a claim could be accepted. A single witness was not enough to confirm a serious accusation. The law’s purpose was to ensure fairness and reduce false accusations, with two or three independent witnesses providing a more reliable and consistent account of events.
Early Greek Culture
In early Greek legal contexts, the principle of multiple witnesses also played a key role in verifying claims. This was tied to the concept of dokimazō (justice or righteousness), which required facts to be verified through testimony.
Greek law, much like Jewish law, required multiple witnesses to ensure the truth of a claim.
In Athenian courts, testimony was a crucial form of evidence, and having multiple witnesses was essential to securing a conviction or proving innocence.
The need for corroboration helped to establish justice and prevent wrongful outcomes.
Establish a Thing
In 2 Corinthians 13:1, Paul writes:
“This is the third time I am coming to you. In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established.”
Here, Paul refers to the principle found in Deuteronomy 19:15 and Matthew 18:16, which call for matters to be confirmed by multiple witnesses. This was common practice in the ancient Jewish world, as well as in early Christian communities.
Paul uses this principle to address serious matters with the Corinthians, likely involving discipline or correction. He emphasizes the importance of witnesses validating his words.
By invoking “two or three witnesses,” Paul stresses that the issues being addressed are of great importance and should be corroborated by others, following the established Scriptural standard for confirming truth.
The Purpose of the Principle of Agreement
Affirming the truth of his claims: By invoking multiple witnesses, Paul highlights that his actions and words are not based on personal opinion but on reliable testimony from others.
Indicating judgment or correction: Paul is signaling that he will act, if necessary, but his judgment will be based on established principles of fairness and truth.
Conclusion
- In Hebrew culture, the principle of “two or three witnesses” ensured fairness in validating claims and accusations.
- In early Greek culture, multiple witnesses were similarly critical in legal proceedings to establish the truth.
- In 2 Corinthians 13:1, Paul uses this principle to reinforce the authority and reliability of his message, preparing the Corinthians for any necessary correction or discipline.
